Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 264-150-0 | CAS number: 63449-39-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu./o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
There are rat and mouse studies conducted by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP, 1986) on the carcinogenic effects of a C23(average) 43%Cl LCCP. These studies were conducted by gavage using very high doses, up to 5000 mg/kg/day. Based on expert reviews of the strength and weight of available evidence, LCCPs are not expected to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 83-2 (Carcinogenicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- US National Toxicology Program
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Chlorinated Paraffins
Average Chain Length: C23
43% Chlorine by Weight
Molecular Weight 560 (average) - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- No data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 103 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5 days/week
- Post exposure period:
- No data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 2500, 5000 mg/kg body weight
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Dosing solutions were stored for no longer than 8 days.
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked included: signs of overt toxicity, morbidity and mortality.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Clinical signs were recorded weekly and palpation was started at week 41.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded weekly for 13 weeks and then monthly. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, Each mouse received a post mortem examination, either on their death or at the termination of the study. Each mouse was subjected to a gross examination and a microscopic examination of a wide range of tissues (as specified).
- Statistics:
- Survival and tumour incidence data were subjected to statistical analyses by comparing the treated groups with the controls using a range of techniques. Tumour incidence in the treated groups was also compared with historical control data when there appeared to be a treatment related increase. Male: Historical incidence at study laboratory (mean +/- SD): 35/299 (12% +/- 5%); historical incidence in NTP studies: 132/1,097 (12% +/- 4%). Female: incidence at study laboratory (mean +/- SD): 18/300 (6% +/- 3%); historical incidence in NTP studies: 74/1092 (7% +/- 4%).
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- No significant differences in survival between dosed and vehicle control groups were observed. For female mice, 60%-70% of the early deaths in each group were attributed to utero-ovarian infection.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant nonneoplastic lesions were considered compound related in mice.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidences of malignant lymphoma in male mice and hepatocellular carcinoma in female mice both showed a positive trend although only the incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice exposed to 5000 mg/kg bw was statistically significant different from controls (Table 1).
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- Maligant lymphoma in male mice.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: toxicity (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: carcinogenicity (migrated information)
- Conclusions:
- An increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice was reported at the highest dose tested, 5000 mg/kg/day.
- Executive summary:
An increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice was reported at the highest dose tested, 5000 mg/kg/day.
The significance of the increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice is unclear. Malignant lymphoma is a commonly occurring tumour in this strain of mouse and the effect was not seen in female mice. Given the very high dose and the limited nature of the finding it appears the study shows just limited evidence of carcinogenicity for long-chain chlorinated paraffin in the mouse.
Overall, while there were some positive findings from this study, they occurred at an exposure level that is so high (5000 mg/kg/day) that the relevance of this property to a human health hazard assessment is doubtful. IARC conclusion for LCCP is Class 3.
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- US National Toxicology Program
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Chlorinated Paraffins
Average Chain Length: C23
43% Chlorine by Weight
Molecular Weight 560 (average) - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 103 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5 days/week
- Post exposure period:
- No data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
male: 0, 1875, 3750 mg/kg body weight; female: 0, 100, 300, 900 mg/kg body weight
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- groups of 70 males/70 females.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Initially, the test material was administered to groups of 70 male and 70 female Fischer 344 rats orally, by gavage, in corn oil. Control groups of 70 male and 70 female rats received corn oil alone. 10 rats from each group were terminated after 6 and 12 months respectively. The remaining 50 rats in each group were dosed for 103 weeks. Dosing solutions were stored for no longer than 8 days.
- Positive control:
- No data
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked included: signs of overt toxicity, morbidity and mortality.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Clinical signs were recorded weekly and palpation was started at week 41.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded weekly for 13 weeks and then monthly. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, Each rat received a post mortem examination, either on their death or at the termination of the study. Each rat was subjected to a gross examination and a microscopic examination of a wide range of tissues (as specified).
- Statistics:
- Survival and tumour incidence data were subjected to statistical analyses by comparing the treated groups with the controls using a range of techniques. Tumour incidence in the treated groups was also compared with historical control data when there appeared to be a treatment related increase. Historical incidence of pheochromocytomas (all types) at study laboratory (mean +/- SD): 16/300 (5% +/- 3%); historical incidence in NTP studies: 65/1,093 (6% +/- 3%)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Survival of dosed and vehicle control rats was similar.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The primary nonneoplastic lesion associated with chlorinated paraffins (C23, 43% chlorine) administration was a diffuse lymphohistiocytic inflammation in the liver and in the pancreatic and mesenteric lymph nodes of male and female rats. Splenic congestion was a secondary effect. These lesions occurred in most animals of all treated groups, earlier and at lower doses in female rats than in male rats.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence of adrenal medullary phaeochromocytomas was increase in treated female rats compared to controls, although there was no evidence of hyperplasia. The increase was statistically significantly different in the group receiving 900 mg/kg bw (Table 1).
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- No significant findings of carcinogenic potential.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- noncancer
- Effect level:
- 1 875 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- lowest dose tested
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- noncancer
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- lowest dose tested
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Not anticipated to be carcinogenic. Non-carcinogenic effects were similar to other repeat-dose studies.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice and hepatocellular carcinoma in female mice.
Dose group(mg/kg/day) | 0 | 2500 | 5000 |
Number males examined | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Incidence of malignant lymphoma in males | 6** | 12 | 16* |
Number females examined | 50 | 49 | 50 |
Incidence of liver tumours in females | |||
Hepatocellular adenoma | 3 | 2 | 7 |
Hepatocellular carcinoma | 1** | 1 | 6 |
Adenoma/carcinoma combined | 4 | 3 | 10 |
* P < 0.05 relative to controls
** p< 0.05 increasing trend
There were no other treatment-related pathological lesions observed in either the male or female mice. The significance of the increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice is unclear. Malignant lymphoma is a commonly occurring tumour in this strain of mouse and the effect was not seen in female mice. At most, the study shows equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity for this long-chain chlorinated paraffin in the mouse.
Table 1. Incidence of adrenal medullary hyperplasia and phaeochromocytomas in female rats.
Dose group (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 900 |
Number examined | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Incidence of hyperplasia | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
Incidence of phaeochromocytoma | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7* |
* p < 0.05
There were no other pathological lesions observed in either the female or male rats.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based upon the available data and expert reviews, no carcinogenicity classification is assigned to LCCPs. This decision is supported by various expert reviews of the strength and weight of available evidence. Key factors underlying the justification for no classification include the following: evidence of carcinogenicity is limited to increases in malignant lymphoma observed in a single sex of one species tested at an unusually high dose; malignant lymphoma is one of the more variable tumors in mice and has a viral origin in many cases; studies of analogous shorter chain chlorinated paraffins have not shown similar findings; a lack of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity by LCCPs.
Additional information
There are rat and mouse studies conducted by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP, 1986) on the carcinogenic effects of a C23(average) 43%Cl LCCP. These studies were conducted by gavage using very high doses, up to 5000 mg/kg/day. Under the conditions of these 2-year gavage studies, NTP concluded there wasno evidence of carcinogenicity*of chlorinated paraffins (C23. 43% chlorine) for male F344/N rats given 1,875 or 3,750 mg/kg per day. There wasequivocal evidence of carcinogenicityof chlorinated paraffins (C23. 43% chlorine) for female F344/N rats as shown by an increased incidence of adrenal gland medullary pheochromocytomas. There wasclear evidence of carcinogenicityof chlorinated paraffins (C23, 43% chlorine) for male B6C3Fl mice as shown by an increase in the incidence of malignant lymphomas. There wasequivocal evidence of carcinogenicityof chlorinated paraffins (C23, 43% chlorine) for female B6C3F1 mice as shown by a marginal increase in the incidence of hepatocellular neoplasms.
In discussing whether the conclusion in male mice should remain clear evidence of carcinogenicity or be changed to some evidence of carcinogenicity, the NTP Science Advisory Board Technical Review Subcommitee members noted that malignant lymphoma is one of the more variable tumors and has a viral origin in many cases, and that statistically significant trends were obtained only if the lymphocytic and histiocytic tumor types were combined. The conclusion for male mice, clear evidence of carcinogenicity, was approved by five affirmative votes to four negative votes with two abstentions.
In contrast to these results, malignant lymphomas were not increased in similar NTP studies carried out on a mixture of shorter chain paraffins chlorinated to approximately 60% by weight (C12, 60% chlorine).
The NTP results and conclusions have been subjected to various reviews (IARC, 1990; NRC, 2000; UK EA, 2009, OECD SIDS, 2009, US EPA, 2013). These are summarized below.
IARC, 1990 concluded that the NTP studies provided limited evidence for the carcinogenicity of LCCP (C23, 43% chlorine), and did not assign a cancer classification for LCCPs.
The US National Research Council (NRC, 2000) reviewed the toxicological risks of selected flame retardant, including a LCCP (C24with 70 wt% Chlorine). It was concluded that: “LCCP are not likely to be a human carcinogen and derivation of a cancer potency factor is unnecessary.”
The UK Environment Agency, 2009 concluded there is evidence that LCCPs are carcinogenic, but only at very high exposure levels. Because the chlorinated paraffins do not appear to have mutagenic potential it is likely that this carcinogenic activity is the result of a non-genotoxic mode of action and it can therefore be assumed that the carcinogenicity will have a threshold exposure level. Accordingly, a NOAEL of 2,500 mg/kg/day, at which the incidence of malignant lymphomas was similar to historical controls, can be identified.
The OECD SIDS Assessment, 2009 concluded that LCCPs present a low carcinogenic potential for humans.
Most recently, the US EPA, 2013 concluded that vLCCPs are not expected to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans. In their review, US EPA commented:
“An increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in male mice was reported at the highest dose of
5,000 mglkg-bw/day when tested using a vLCCP (C23, 43 wt% Cl) in carcinogenicity studies in
male and female rats and mice. Malignant lymphoma is one of the more variable tumors in mice
and has a viral origin in many cases. In addition, data on the analogous short-chain chlorinated
paraffins ("SCCPs") have shown no increase in the incidence of malignant lymphoma in a carcinogenicity study of SCCPs. Therefore, EPA concludes that the increased incidence of
malignant lymphoma in male mice was not test-article related. Based on the foregoing
information, along with the lack ofin vitroandin vivogenotoxicity of vLCCPs, the Agency
concludes that vLCCPs are not expected to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.”
Finally, the dose at which the increased incidence of malignant lymphoma was observed in male mice by NTP was 5000 mg/kg/day. This is very high dose by current testing standards. Current OECD testing guidelines for chronic toxicity studies state that the top dose should not exceed 1000 mg/kg body weight/day (limit dose), except in cases when human exposure indicates the need for a higher dose level to be used.
References
IARC, 1990 IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Some Flame Retardants and Textile Chemicals, and Exposures in the Textile Manufacturing Industry. Volume 48. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1990.
NTP, 1986. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of chlorinated paraffins (C23, 43 percent chlorine) (Cas no. 633449-39-8) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 (gavage studies). NTP Technical Report No. 305.
UK Environment Agency (EA, of England and Wales) (2009). Environmental Risk Evaluation Report: Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins. January 2009.
US EPA, 2013. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399-0012.
NRC, 2000. Toxicological Risks of Selected Flame-Retardant Chemicals.
OECD SIDS Assessment Report,Long Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (LCCPs).October, 2009
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)