Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 276-743-1 | CAS number: 72624-02-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin:
At 100% 2 animals showed necrosis and exfoliation.
At 50% 1 animal showed blanching
Evidence of skin irritation was observed at concentration down to 6.25%.
As the study was terminated at 72 hours there is no evidence that the results seen at the higher concentrations would be reversible.
Eye:
There is in vivo evidence of severe effects to the eye of rabbits
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1991-10-25 to 1991-11-2
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Guideline study with 24 hour exposure and termination at 72 hours without evidence of reversibility
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-5 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- skin was not abraded
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Group 1:
One intact site per rabbit treated with pure (100%) test material.
Group 2:
4 intact sites per rabbit treated with four single applications of the test material at concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25% in light, white mineral oil. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazleton Research Products Inc., Denve, Pennsylvania, USA
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2715 - 3176 g
- Housing: Individual suspended wire mesh cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 66 - 70°F
- Humidity (%): 43 - 72%
- Air changes (per hr): Not specified
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour light/dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1991-10-25 To: 1991-11-02 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- other: light white mineral oil
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/site
- Concentration (if solution): 100%
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- Concentration (if solution): 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.5% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 12 rabbits (3 male, 9 female)
2 x group of 6 rabbits - Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
Group 1
- Area of exposure: back, 1" x 1" patch, one site only
- % coverage: not specified
Group 2
- Area of exposure: back, 1" x 1" patch, 4 sites per rabbit
- % coverage: not specified
- Type of wrap if used: 2 ply gauze patch overwrapped with a gauze binder and secured with Dermiform tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes, disposal paper towels moistened with tepid tap water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hour
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 100% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.5
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 100% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 3.4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 25% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 25% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 12.5% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 12.5% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: 6.25% test material
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.58
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: 6.25% test material
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Dermal observations (See Table 1)
In Group 1, neat (100%) test material induced severe erythema and slight to moderate oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Exfoliation and necrosis were noted on two sites each. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 6.25% w/v concentration induced very slight to slight erythema and oedema on six and three sites respectively. Desquamation was noted on one site. There were no other dermal findings
In Group 2, the 12.5% w/v concentration induced slight to moderate erythema and very slight to slight oedema. Desquamation was present on one site. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 25% w/v concentration induced slight to severe erythema and oedema. Eschar was noted on two sites. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 50% w/v concentration induced severe erythema and moderate to severe oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Blanching was noted on one site. - Other effects:
- Mortality:
None of the rabbits died.
Body weights:
There were no treatment related effects on bodyweight - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1C (corrosive)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Pure test material Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study the pure test material induced necrosis in 2 out of 6 animals by the 72 hour observation period and at the 50% w/v concentration, blanching was seen in one out of 6 animals. In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is required for skin corrosivity/irritation.
Erythema and oedema scores for the 12.5% w/v concentration would preclude the classification as a skin irritant at this dose level. However in the absence of observations beyond the 72 hour time point the potential for reversibilty of these effects is unknown. Therefore classification as Cat 2: Irritant is applicable at this concentration level. - Executive summary:
Test Guidance
Skin irritation study performed by a similar method to US OPP 81-5.Method and Material
Group 1:
Six New Zealand White rabbits were shaved and a 0.5 mL portion of the test material was applied to an intact skin site. A gauze patch was placed over each application site and an impervious material was wrapped around the trunk of the animal to hold the patches. The wrapping was removed after 4 hours and washed .
Group 2:
Six New Zealand White rabbits were shaved and 4 intact sites per rabbit treated with four single applications of 0.5 mL each of the test material at concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25% in light, white mineral oil. A gauze patch was placed over each application site and an impervious material was wrapped around the trunk of the animal to hold the patches. The wrapping was removed after 4 hours and washed .
Treated areas were examined for erythema and oedema using the Draize method of scoring at 24 and 72 hours.
Results
In Group 1, neat (100%) test material induced severe erythema and slight to moderate oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Exfoliation and necrosis were noted on two sites each. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 6.25% w/v concentration induced very slight to slight erythema and oedema on six and three sites respectively. Desquamation was noted on one site. There were no other dermal findings In Group 2, the 12.5% w/v concentration induced slight to moderate erythema and very slight to slight oedema. Desquamation was present on one site. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 25% w/v concentration induced slight to severe erythema and oedema. Eschar was noted on two sites. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 50% w/v concentration induced severe erythema and moderate to severe oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Blanching was noted on one site.
The only evidence of reversibility over the limited timeframe of the study was for oedema responses at the 6.25% test concentration.
Conclusion
In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is required for skin corrosion/irritation.
Reference
Table 1: Observations
Rabbit Number |
Erythema |
Oedema |
||
24 h |
72 h |
24 h |
72 h |
|
100% |
||||
1 |
4e |
4e |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4e |
4e |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4e |
4ex |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4e |
4en |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4e |
4en |
3 |
2 |
6 |
4e |
4ex |
2 |
3 |
Mean Total |
4.0 |
2.5 |
||
50% |
||||
1 |
4e |
4e |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4e |
4e |
4 |
3 |
3 |
4e |
4e |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4e |
4e |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4be |
4be |
4 |
4 |
6 |
4e |
4e |
3 |
3 |
Mean Total |
4.0 |
3.4 |
||
25% |
||||
1 |
4e |
4e |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4e |
3 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
Mean Total |
2.9 |
2.67 |
||
12.5% |
||||
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1d |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Mean Total |
2.0 |
1.5 |
||
6.25% |
||||
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1d |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Mean Total |
1.5 |
0.58 |
e = eschar
n = necrosis
x = exfoliation
d = desquamation
b = blanching
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982-05-03 to 1982-05-24
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-like study (QA signature), guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Section 1500.3- Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulations - 16 CFR
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: stainless steel cage with elevated wire mesh flooring
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°F): 70±2°F
- Humidity (%): 45±5%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour light/dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1982-05-03 To: 1982-05-24 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Eyes were not rinsed throughout study
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize method - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hour
- Score:
- 0.72
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not reversible in 5/6 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hour
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hour
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hour
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not reversible in 4/6 animals
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In accordance with EU CLP Regulation No. 1272/2008 classification of this substance is required for eye irritation.
- Executive summary:
Test Guidance
Eye irritation study performed by a similar method to 16 CFR 1500.42 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act,Method and Material
0.1 mL of the test material was instilled into the right eye of six young adult albino rabbits. The left eye served as the untreated control. The test material was not washed from the eye. Treated eyes were examined at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days following treatment. Interpretation of results was made in accordance with the Draize scale.
Results
No effects on the iris were observed in any animal at any observation period. Redness of the conjunctivae had dissipated in all animals by the 14 day observation period. Mild irreversible (5/6 animals) opacity of the cornea was observed throughout the study period. Severe chemosis was observed in all animals up to 7 days after test material installation. Chemosis in 3 animals appeared to have reversed by the 14 day observation but mild chemosis was seen at 21 days in these animals. One further animal showed no indication of reversibility of chemosis throughout the study period.
Conclusion
In accordance with EU CLP Regulation No. 1272/2008 classification of this substance as Cat 1: Irreversible effects on the eye, is required for eye irritation.
Reference
Table 1: Observations
Rabbit Number |
Cornea |
Iris |
Conjunctivae |
Chemosis |
||||||||
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Mean Total |
0.72 |
0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin
There is one key study and one supporting study on skin corrosion/irritation.
In the key skin irritation study performed by a similar method to US OPP 81-5. Two groups of rabbits were treated:
Group 1: Six New Zealand White rabbits were shaved and a 0.5 mL portion of the test material was applied to an intact skin site. A gauze patch was placed over each application site and an impervious material was wrapped around the trunk of the animal to hold the patches. The wrapping was removed after 4 hours and washed .
Group 2: Six New Zealand White rabbits were shaved and 4 intact sites per rabbit treated with four single applications of 0.5 mL each of the test material at concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25% in light, white mineral oil. A gauze patch was placed over each application site and an impervious material was wrapped around the trunk of the animal to hold the patches. The wrapping was removed after 4 hours and washed .
Treated areas were examined for erythema and oedema using the Draize method of scoring at 24 and 72 hours.
In Group 1, neat (100%) test material induced severe erythema and slight to moderate oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Exfoliation and necrosis were noted on two sites each. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 6.25% w/v concentration induced very slight to slight erythema and oedema on six and three sites respectively. Desquamation was noted on one site. There were no other dermal findings In Group 2, the 12.5% w/v concentration induced slight to moderate erythema and very slight to slight oedema. Desquamation was present on one site. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 25% w/v concentration induced slight to severe erythema and oedema. Eschar was noted on two sites. There were no other dermal findings.
In Group 2, the 50% w/v concentration induced severe erythema and moderate to severe oedema. Eschar was present on all sites. Blanching was noted on one site.
The only evidence of reversibility over the limited timeframe of the study was for oedema responses at the 6.25% test concentration.
In the supporting study by Costello (1982) the study was performed by a similar method to 16 CFR 1500.41 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulations.
Six New Zealand White rabbits were clipped and then one side of the back was abraded to penetrate the stratum corneum with the other side kept intact. A 0.5 mL portion of the test material was applied to an abraded and an intact skin site of the same rabbit. A gauze patch was placed over each application site and an impervious material was wrapped around the trunk of the animal to hold the patches. The wrapping was removed after 24 hours. Treated areas were examined for erythema and edema using the Draize method of scoring at 24 and 72 hours.
Well-defined erythema and slight oedema formation was observed at the intact and abraded sites of all animals at 24 hours. At 72 hours well-defined erythema and very slight oedema was observed at the intact and abraded sites of all animals was observed at all intact sites and abraded sites of all animals. There was no evidence of reversibility over the limited timeframe of the study.
In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is required for skin corrosion/irritation.
Eye
The key eye irritation study was performed by a similar method to 16 CFR 1500.42 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act,
0.1 mL of the test material was instilled into the right eye of six young adult albino rabbits. The left eye served as the untreated control. The test material was not washed from the eye. Treated eyes were examined at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days following treatment. Interpretation of results was made in accordance with the Draize scale.
No effects on the iris were observed in any animal at any observation period. Redness of the conjunctivae had dissipated in all animals by the 14 day observation period. Mild irreversible (5/6 animals) opacity of the cornea was observed throughout the study period. Severe chemosis was observed in all animals up to 7 days after test material installation. Chemosis in 3 animals appeared to have reversed by the 14 day observation but mild chemosis was seen at 21 days in these animals. One further animal showed no indication of reversibility of chemosis throughout the study period.
In accordance with EU CLP Regulation No. 1272/2008 classification of this substance as Cat 1: Irreversible effects on the eye, is required for eye irritation.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
GLP Guideline study performed at various concentrations.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
GLP Guideline study
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: corrosive
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin:
At 100% 2 animals showed necrosis and exfoliation.
At 50% 1 animal showed blanching
Evidence of skin irritation was observed at concentration down to 6.25%.
As the study was terminated at 72 hours there is no evidence that the results seen at the higher concentrations would be reversible.
Therefore with regard to classification the following Specific Concentration Levels (SCL) are suggested:
25%≥ Cat 1C ≤100%.
6.25%≥ Cat 2 <25%
Skin Cat 3 < 6.25% (ie not classified according to CLP)
Eye:
There is in vivo evidence of severe effects to the eye of rabbits. In addition the classification of the substance as corrosive/irritant automatically assumes effects to the eye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.