Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-344-0 | CAS number: 793-24-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In conclusion, the test substance 6PPD was not skin irritating to rabbits skin (Monsanto Co. 1973, Randall and Bannister 1990). The even very low skin irritation potential is confirmed by an additional skin irritation studies (Monsanto Co. 1962). A rather slight and transient eye irritation potential is noted in two eye irritation studies (Monsanto Co. 1962, 1973).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study meets generally accepted scientific principles, data from summary without detailed documentation, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other skin irritation study
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: intact and abraded skin
- Vehicle:
- other: undiluted (warmed to 46°C to liquefy)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Concentration: 0.5 other: ml (undiluted)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- 7 d
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- other: no effects
- Remarks on result:
- other: no effects
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
Reference
RS-Freetext:
AVERAGE SCORE
0.0/8.0
Non irritating to rabbit skin
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study meets generally accepted scientific principles, data from summary without detailed documentation, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: in vivo eye irritation study
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Vehicle:
- other: undiluted (warmed to 46°C)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- undiluted
Amount applied: 0.1 ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 d
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- Comment: no data
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: transient slight erythema, transient discharge and discomfort
- Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
Reference
RS-Freetext:
AVERAGE SCORE:
1.2/110
immediate: slight discomfort
1 h: slight erythema, capious discharge
24 h: slight erythema, moderate discharge
48 h: slight erythema
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin
There are no studies according to the current OECD guideline; however, there are study reports which give sufficient information to evaluate this endpoint.
The skin irritation potential of the test substance 6PPD was evaluated in a skin irritation study with six New Zealand albino male and female rabbits (Monsanto Co. 1973, Randall and Bannister 1990). The warmed test substance (500 ml warmed to 46°C to liquefy) was applied under semi-occlusive dressings to clipped intact and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand albino rabbits for 24 hours. A 7-day observation period followed the test substance application. The test substance 6PPD was practically non-irritating to rabbit skin (mean irritation score: 0).
In an earlier study undiluted 6PPD (amount not given) was applied to the clipped, intact skin of 3 rabbits for 24 hours under a dressing of plastic strips. The compound was removed with soap and water. Within 4 hours 2/3 rabbits developed barely perceptible redness (average score 0.6/8 according to the method of Draize). At the 24 hour-reading slight to well defined erythema were reported as the maximal reaction (score 1.6) returning to barely perceptible redness within 72 hours (score 1.0) and complete reversibility within 120 hours (score 0.0). The compound was evaluated as a slight irritant (Monsanto Co. 1962).
In another limited documented skin irritation study groups of 6 rabbits were exposed to preparations of 6PPD in vaseline (0.5 g with 2.5 or 25 % 6PPD corresponding to 0.0125 and 0.125 g 6PPD) or olive oil (0.025 g 6PPD in 0.5 ml oil) according to the method of Draize (no information on occlusion). Exposure of the scarified or unscarified skin was for 24 hours, further readings were after 24 and 72 hours. Neither individual nor average scores for erythema / oedema or the time course of the reaction and the reversibility of effects were documented in the available publication. Test results were presented as primary cutaneous irritation indexes (PCII) of 0.6 and 1.0 calculated for the low and high concentration vaseline preparation of 6PPD, leading for both to a classification of low irritant potential (criteria not documented). In contrast for the oily preparation a PCII of 3.3 was reported which was evaluated as a medium irritating effect (Herve-Bazin et al., 1977). In view of possible vehicle effects and the limited documentation of this publication, the findings were not included in the risks assessment, which is in line with the recent OECD risk assessment on 6PPD (2005).
Eye
There are no studies according to the current OECD guideline but there are study reports which give sufficient information to evaluate this endpoint.
The eye irritating potential of the test substance 6PPD was evaluated in an eye irritation study with New Zealand albino rabbits (Monsanto Co. 1973). 100 ml of the test substance (warmed to 46°C to liquefy) was applied into the conjuntival sac of the rabbits. A 7-day observation period followed the application of the test substance. Eye response were scored in accordance with the Federal Hazardous substances Act (F.H.S.A.), 21 CFR, § 191.12 (1964).
The test substance was slightly irritating to the rabbit eye (irritation mean score at 24, 48, and 72 hours: 1.2/110.0). Effects on the conjunctivae were noted in all animals at 24 hours (mean score 24 h: 5.6/110) but were reversible within 72 hours. The test substance was not classified as an eye irritant according to F.H.S.A.
In another eye irritation study undiluted 6PPD (0.1 ml) was applied to the eyes of 3 rabbits for 24 hours followed by a 5 day post exposure period. After 1 hour slight edema and erythema, copious discharge and slight dullness of the corneal area were observed with an average score of 20.6/110 according to the method of Draize. Iris and cornea cleared somewhat in 24 hours and within 72 hours iris clarity was normal. Very slight redness and edema disappeared by the 5th day (Monsanto Co.1962).
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification is required according to the classification criteria 67/548/EEC and regulation no. 1272/2008 (GHS).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.