Decision on data-sharing appeal published
In case A-010-2017, a previous registrant challenged ECHA’s decision to grant a potential registrant permission to refer to information from tests on vertebrate animals.
The Board of Appeal found that ECHA can, depending on the circumstances of a case, assess whether the data and cost-sharing terms proposed are fair, transparent and non-discriminatory. It held that in this case, the previous registrant had insisted on terms that were not transparent and/or unfair and/or discriminatory.
In the circumstances of the case, the Board of Appeal found that ECHA was correct in finding that the potential registrant had made every effort. The Board of Appeal therefore dismissed the appeal.
Decision
|